Future

The project is aimed at achieving a peaceful, sustainable, constantly and steadily developing global civilization, through the transition to a global resource-based economy, universal automation, the introduction of all the latest scientific achievements in all areas of human life and the application of scientific decision-making methodology.
Project goals:
1) Global recognition of the Earth’s natural resources as the property of all humanity.
2) Abolition of artificial borders dividing people.
3) Transition from monetary-oriented national economies of individual countries to a global resource-oriented economy.
4) Stabilization of the world population through increased education and voluntary birth control.
5)Environmental restoration.
6) Reconstruction of cities, transport systems, agricultural and industrial enterprises into energy-saving, environmentally friendly systems that can meet the needs of all people.
7) Gradual complete abandonment of such forms of governance as corporations and governments (local, national or transnational).
8) Mutual exchange of technologies and their use for the benefit of all peoples.
9)Development and use of clean renewable energy sources.
10)Making only the highest quality products for everyone in the world (see. planned obsolescence).
11) Conducting preliminary studies of any large construction projects for possible environmental impacts.
12) Encouraging creativity and creativity in a person in all its manifestations.
13) Getting rid of the remnants of the past (nationalism, fanaticism) and prejudices by increasing the level of education of the world’s population.
14) Elimination of any types of elitism, including technical.
15) Develop methodologies through scientific research, not random opinions.
16) Creation of a new language of communication based on bringing it closer to the outside world.
17) Providing people not only with everything necessary for life, but also nurturing individuality through tasks that stimulate the human mind.
18) Intellectual and emotional preparation of people for upcoming changes.
Impressive, isn’t it?? Utopian?
Perhaps, but Fresco himself released several films, supporting his point of view with strong arguments.

The project has been worked out to the smallest detail, from architecture to transport and social relations in the future. Jacques also analyzed the modern system in detail. There are enough resources on our planet for everyone, but we continue to spend billions of dollars (or even more) on military needs (hello to the States whose military budget can build communism in every corner of the world), with proper management we can achieve abundance for everyone. There is just one BUT.
When the collapse of the old system occurs, no one knows what humanity will do, we can either kill each other or come to something greater, Jacques himself does not know the answer to how this can be avoided.

The so-called resource-based economy is also of interest.
Resource-based economy. Resource Based Economy) is a system in which all things and services are available without the use of any commodity-monetary exchange (money, barter, etc.). n.). A resource-based economy is only possible if all natural resources are recognized as the common property of all inhabitants of the planet.
The basic premises of the ROE theory are that the planet is abundant in the resources necessary to create any materials, and the practice of rationing resources through monetary methods is not counterproductive to the survival of humanity.
In scientific works, a resource-based economy is understood as such an economy, the basic growth factor of which is the use of any resources. Options for increasing the efficiency of such an economy through technical and technological development, including technologies for managing these resources, are being considered.
But Jacques Fresco was not the first to talk about such a system; something similar was developed back in the USSR.

OGAS project. There are many wonderful people whose achievements were unclaimed during their lifetime and forgotten after death. Such people die without special honors, their names are forgotten. But not forever. Over time, humanity looks back and pays due respect to such people. One of these undeservedly forgotten is the scientist Viktor Mikhailovich Glushkov, academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences, corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences, editor-in-chief of the journal Cybernetics, Honored Scientist of the Ukrainian SSR, vice-president of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, hero of socialist labor… we can continue ad infinitum. Among all the titles and honors, Glushkov has one achievement that is not only not appreciated, but also deliberately forgotten – the OGAS project (National Automated Economy Management System). This project was never realized. Instead, Kosygin’s reforms were carried out, aimed at increasing the role of self-financing in the Soviet economy, and as a result – to the growth of commodity-money relations and, ultimately, to the destruction of the USSR.

What is OGAS?
In short, OGAS is a simple and elegant means of creating complete communism.

Glushkov envisioned the creation of a three-stage system for information processing and economic management. Primary stage – level of an individual enterprise. In real time, all the necessary information about manufactured products, the state of affairs in warehouses, the number of workers, etc. is automatically collected. d. Data is displayed on the display in an easy-to-read format. This allows any worker in a few minutes to get a complete picture of the work of his own enterprise, propose changes (the computer will immediately process them, and if the rationalization proposal is really effective, it will be immediately applied) to the work, etc. d.

The second stage is the sectoral and territorial level. All information collected at individual enterprises is redirected to an intermediate center, where it is processed and also available for perception in a convenient form. In general, the situation with a separate production unit is repeated, but at a higher level. Finally, the third and final stage is managing the entire economy from the center. We must draw the reader’s attention to the fact that the project was proposed in the 60s., when the capacity of information systems was not yet sufficient for decentralized management, it was also unknown about distributed computing, etc. d. Therefore, OGAS inevitably bore the “birthmarks” of the previous era. However, despite all these disadvantages, he could well fulfill his mission – creating the technological basis of a communist society.

Advantages of OGAS
The first obvious advantage is the reduction of the bureaucracy. Everything is very simple here: since a machine can perform the role of Soviet planners (collect and process information), and even better, then the bureaucratic apparatus is no longer needed. In any case, as expanded as it was in the 60s., not to mention the 70s. 20th century.

The second advantage arising from the first is the complete victory over the deficit. A machine that takes into account all economic information in real time, allows you to effectively plan the production of the necessary products. Moreover, with a reduction in working hours. According to some scientists, already in the 60s., subject to the use of cybernetic planning methods, it was possible to make a 5-hour working day with its subsequent reduction to 4 hours. What’s important is that it will be predominantly interesting, creative work, which will be a pleasure to do, not a misfortune. That is, this means that it would even be possible to raise the issue of abolishing compulsory labor, at least in the form of an experiment, with the preservation of labor service for routine work. Let every member of society engage in physical labor for some time. Considering the total population of the USSR, this would be only one month per year.

The third advantage of https://bingositesnotongamstop.co.uk/1-deposit-bingo/ implementing OGAS is overcoming the need to use money. Under capitalism, money can easily be converted into capital, that is, into a self-expanding value. To put it simply, they can be used to make a profit. There are many ways: put money in a bank, invest in production or another project, venture (that is, risky) investments, buy cheaper to sell more expensive, etc. d. Not to mention the money could be stolen or used on the black market. In the USSR, by the way, some of the methods of converting money into capital (for example, using it on the black market) were never closed. On the contrary, the shadow economy began to flourish in the 60s.

OGAS solves all these problems very simply. It is enough for each person to make, as we would now say, an electronic wallet with the ability to pay with money only in state stores. Transfer of funds to third parties is prohibited. At the same time, salaries are paid not in rubles, but in a new unit – energy or “energy costs”. The machine knows exactly how much energy it costs to produce any product and how much energy people give in different types of work. Actually, the tariff scale is the closest approximation to the new hypothetical system. Over time, the development of production forces makes the production of goods increasingly cheaper and money becomes just “candy wrappers” used for ease of counting. Actually, they become candy wrappers (they cease to be capital and are deprived of any opportunity to become one) from the first day of the implementation of OGAS.

In fact, OGAS was then supposed to become what today’s Internet is only approaching. Approaching spontaneously and uncontrollably.

Actually, that’s all for now, if it’s interesting I can add more.

Best comments

Eh, what kind of person are you.
The 90s were not the easiest and most pleasant, and being already much older and living with my parents in abundance, I heard a lot of my mother’s stories about how, at about my age, they ate almost nothing but air, although my father worked at a factory as an electrical engineer, but who was deceived more than once by his superiors with his salary. And all this arctic fox despite the fact that they only had ONE child then. And all this influenced my thinking in such a way that I decided for myself that I did not want to repeat the mistakes of my parents and try to provide for myself and my future family for several decades of idleness ahead.

And many of those people who have ten children, not only work in low-paid jobs (often don’t even work at all), they continue to rivet their children as zergs.
I can sympathize with them in connection with the situation that some people who sit for hours drinking tea and thinking about love, instead of plowing, and receive for this almost as much as a really working person (your humble servant), while janitors, etc.d. they pay a pittance. It’s the fault of our economic system.
The state may be to blame for not providing such people with at least the bare minimum, but this is not a reason for fathers and mothers of 10 children to continue to give birth and give birth to new ones, without having the means to provide them with at least healthy food and quality clothing to begin with.
Yes, and you yourself should know how now in our society a person can be pecked to death by his own idiot acquaintances (of which 95%) due to the lack of all sorts of not very necessary items “YOU DON’T HAVE A NEW IPHONE, FUU, ROGGER, BL*”

Now ask yourself this question: Do you still consider me a fascist?? Or a realist?

Well, it’s not too much. And sometimes in the news, and sometimes in real life, you come across people who have given birth to a dozen children and live worse than ever, huddled in a one-room room and asking for help from the state. Well, you have to think with your head, not your head 🙁
Provide the children with everything they need so that they do not feel inferior in our consumer society, and then do what you want

Never a fascist. I’m just opening your eyes to the disgusting truth of life. Keep living in the world of pink unicorns, kitty

Any voluminous and constructive answer from me on the topic of why “We” are shit is useless. Because I have certain mental defects that prevent me from doing such things. I’ll just confine myself to the fact that I liked only the first few dozen pages, and that was largely due to the fact that when in the book there were words like “We will integrate the secrets of the universe, glory to the integral,” etc.d and t.n., I imagined crests and their races ^_^

Well they have weight too. But I did not deny the fact that even if the financial side is not the most prosperous, they can be happy. But admit it, they’re a minority.

Should be, but isn’t. This is exactly what I’m talking about. Look at the world without your rose-colored glasses, my!

Fascist. I don’t really care about public opinion. I’ve been a social outcast since I was 5 years old. These fucking iPhones don’t work for me, even though I can afford any iPhone. I myself have been using the Diamond Touch 2 for 6 years now, and I’m thinking of changing it only because of the slowness of this phone. We need to fight the disadvantage of being like everyone else, having the same thing as everyone else. In general, you judge those families by yourself. You don’t need much to live. All sorts of expensive blue cheeses, cruises to Montorejonnier, etc. It’s all luxury. But it is not necessary for life. The only important thing is that these children grow up to be good and useful people to society. Ana is a freak. Everything else doesn’t matter.

this option is not only in “Brave New World”. Many dystopias describe this option. Or something similar. Zamyatin “We”, for example. If you want children, you need to get permission. And then they will give it to you only if you meet the “maternal standard”.

In short, Manul is a loser again and has disgraced himself ^_^

Now the revolution will be the last revolution in the history of Russia. Funeral march for her. Our Western partners will not make the mistake they made in the 90s and will finish us off completely. Collapse of Russia, civil war, population decline.

In quotes I hope? After all, in the end the book completely merges 🙁 Nothing is 1984, except 1984. GLORY TO ORWELL.

The right to reproduction is one of the basic human rights, and not one pig, not one bastard has the right to interfere with this right. Only the person decides how many children he wants. Everything else is rabid Nazism, fascism, dictatorship and, in general, violations of human rights and freedoms.

Islam has a very good rule regarding harems and polygamy. You can have as many wives as you like, but you MUST provide all your wives with a decent standard of living. So that they do not starve, are not crowded, and do not need anything. You catch the analogy?
Previously, many children were born due to the fact that few of them lived to adulthood. Give birth a lot, maybe someone will survive. The upbringing was easy to solve. At five years old in the fields and norms.
It’s not enough to give birth now. It is necessary to raise a child as a worthy member of society, so that upon reaching adulthood, he can join society without any problems, and does not become a marginalized person, a lumpen person, or a criminal element. That is, everyone needs to be given a decent education, education, etc.

But by the way, you can. IN O brave new world it’s written about it. Most people sterilize and grow humans in test tubes.