One of the most outstanding simulators of conquering towers and gutting wild animals gets its natural continuation. The third part of the exotic action film won the main prize in 2012 based on the results of our audience voting. Opinions vary widely as to whether Far Cry 4 has the potential to eclipse such success.
Far Cry 4
Best comments
Good game. But if in the next part the gameplay is the same again, say, without obvious innovations, then it will be a bit boring.
“Why change something that is already excellent??"This can’t last forever..
In my opinion, the game does not deserve the ratings it received. This is trash. Copy-paste everything possible from part 3. Ubisoft didn’t bother at all. But people love it, so there is no doubt that the 5th part will soon appear, which will again be exactly the same, only in a new setting.
Buy the game only for those who have not played the previous part. The rest can pass by, you won’t lose anything.
I don’t like reviews like this. That is, to say at the beginning and at the end that the game is very cool and good, and then for the remaining 5 minutes to scold it for everything in a row is strange. That is, such reviews tend to suggest that the game is still passable, because more is said about the disadvantages than about the advantages. Such reviews don’t even provide all the necessary information: about the arenas there, or about the ability to shoot from a car, etc.d. They’re meant for someone who’s already played the game and they’re like, "Yeah, that’s right.". And this review only inclined me towards unnecessary doubts, although before that I had not even seen any other option other than to buy.
Changes are different from changes. In contrast, we can recall the qualitative leap between the 1st and 2nd parts of Assassins. Or the difference between the same 3rd Far Cry, and the 2nd, which, let me remind you, was the first for Yubikov. And I don’t agree with Dogs, they have more chances to change for the better, because the 1st part was seriously beaten by critics than the same Far Cry 5, because the 4th part as a whole received excellent ratings, and complaints about the lack of innovations were expressed in reviews in passing, and without much influence on the final rating. Stopgeym didn’t stand out from the crowd here.
Maxim Kulakov once said (or wrote) that the same rating in text and video reviews was made only so as not to break the brains of poor users, but in fact any rating is subjective, etc.d.
So, reviews like this one, when the author of 90% of the running time hints that the game is generally commendable, and then at the end tries to explain it as “amazing” (or vice versa, as, for example, in the video review of SC: Blacklist, when Kulakov, after a 15-minute description of an excellent game, tried to explain “commendable” by some semi-mythical bugs), IMHO they break the brain much more.
In MW we were https://nokyccasinos.org.uk/review/golden-pharaoh-casino/ not forced to capture 100500 towers, kill animals for leveling up, etc., it was completed in an evening and did not have time to get boring, so MW2 was still as interesting to play as the first part + they did a good job on the multiplayer and brought it to almost perfection.
AC2 had a lot of innovations compared to AC1. The game was perceived completely differently.
Crysis 3 is also not a copy of the second part. He’s worse. On all counts.
Here’s an example from Battlefield that’s really relevant. And if you say that the 4th part is not criticized, then you are probably from some other planet. Everyone I know says that this is DLC for the 3rd part, only with a worse single and with more bugs.
Grow wider? 5 times? Well, that’s right – we need even more towers, items for leveling up and types of animals. This will make the game much more interesting. I never thought about getting into game design?
I will answer here, but I will try to give as broad an explanation as possible, for everyone.
I need to somehow bring the story to the final editorial rating of “amazing”, which is why, in fact, positive notes were added in the final paragraph. Yes, I don’t think Far Cry 4 is amazing. At all. Which he seemed to make clear. To listen or not is up to you.
Regarding the facts, I have named the fundamental differences. It was also said that the game largely copies the third part. If you are not familiar with it, open the corresponding review and get acquainted (one, two) – everything is simple and logical. Well, as for “shooting from a car” – if you list even such little things, the video review will turn into a twenty-minute dry list – I don’t think this is the right direction.
Anyway, thanks for the comment. I will take into account your opinion.
Well, what you said about the assassins is debatable, for many and for me personally, the first part is much cooler than the second..
Far Cry 4 is like Battlefield 4, damn DLC, presented as a full-fledged game, which is needed only to enrich the developers and create another DLC… Straight, everyone now wants to go to the conveyor belt, I hate KoLda for this. If it weren’t for her, few sane publishers would have decided to do this, but now people just look at this and think:
-Look, CoD has been coming out once a year for 6 years and earns at least a billion for one part, but we have to put our souls into it and earn 6 times less just out of the desire to do something grandiose. To hell with it!
And then they do this.
P.S. I think the game is not bad, but it is certainly not outstanding; for those who have not played Far Cry 3 it will seem cool, but for everyone else who is not a fan, it will be a terrible copycat.
We’re more than fine, thank you. We even have such a concept as “author’s opinion”. Isn’t this wonderful??
I volunteered to review Far Cry 4, because I really liked Far Cry 3 at one time and I reviewed it. Same as on Blood Dragon. If I were a medium or something like that (in order to understand without playing the game that I would not like it that much), then perhaps I would not have taken this job then. But, unfortunately, I don’t have paranormal abilities. This is the first thing. And secondly, we don’t have an approach where everyone reviews only what they like. It would be stupid and boring.
The game is gorgeous… But absolutely empty in terms of the necessary content. This is a sandbox where there are many, many tasks and “fun”. But they forgot to start the plot. Yes, you choose who to help, but this has little effect. If there was a final video with post-stories of all the characters, then I would forgive everything. And so – it’s just a sandbox. High quality, but without any meaning.
The assessment is given collectively. And sometimes the opinion of an individual author differs greatly from the general one. Deal with it.
It’s funny that most likely the game will be Wolfik, to whom you gave a commendable rating. yeah. he’s a hundred times cooler.
It’s true that my computer is no longer a “high-end” one, but it’s not just me where the FPS dropped—a similar thing also happened on Max Kulakov’s collider—and regardless of how busy the scenes were. So maybe the problem is not with my hardware.
If the game in your opinion is not amazing, then why are you making a video review of it?. You are a masochist? Or were you pressured?? Or forced? I agree with the cookie’s comment. This is more than strange. A stream of Risen 3 is made by a person who can’t digest this game, a video review of “amazing” is made by a person who doesn’t think it’s amazing… You’re all right there?)))
Leave a Reply